| Awards are given according to the size of the audit shop. The Small Shop category comprises the audit shops with between 1 and 5 auditors. There were 18 submissions from small shops this year.
GOLD – Gresham (OR)
 Project: Gresham Fire and Emergency Services Overtime: Actions Recommended to Reduce Costs
Gresham tackled the overtime issue head on with very clear analysis of the current state and developed recommendations that were very effective. Their focus on payroll analysis, effective use of graphics, and recommendations that were easily grasped presented a solid case for change. Their engaging, clear, and concise writing style held the reader’s attention. They defined their project scope clearly and ensured that their report did not stray from the purpose they wished to accomplish. Implementation of their recommendations is expected to result in direct savings of over $200,000 per year. Of special note is the fact that this was the first full audit report produced by the new audit office.
Silver – Palo Alto (CA)
 Project: Audit of Parks Maintenance
Palo Alto made very good use of their best practice research as they undertook a very comprehensive audit of parks maintenance. The report was quite well-written and easy to follow and reflected the fact that they considered all aspects of park maintenance, not just costs. Their focus on the health and safety of the community was an essential component of their audit work. The level of detailed analysis they undertook allowed them to develop detailed maintenance costs for each park site that will allow the client to determine the best method of determining whether to do the work in-house or contract it out. Their commitment to working with the client and the persuasiveness of their arguments resulted in nearly all their recommendations being accepted. Implementation of their recommendations is expected to result in savings of $400,000 per year, which is about 10% of the City’s Parks Division budget.
Bronze – Metro ( Portland, OR)
 Project: Eliminate or Revise the Regional System Fee Credit Program
Metro developed an audit scope that allowed them not only to describe how their regional waste processing system program had outlived its usefulness, but also provided options for Metro to consider in light of political realities as they decided the program’s future. They clearly identified the ways in which the existing program was failing to meet its original goals. They also offered clear alternatives that would ensure that if the program was discontinued, the original program goals could still be accomplished at lesser cost. They used photographs and well-written examples to make their points without overwhelming the report. Their well-organized and clearly presented report contributed to the persuasiveness of their recommendations. Their recommendations were all accepted by management, who began implementation right away.
Honorable Mention – Torrance (CA)
Project: City of Torrance Audit of Residential Rubbish Billing
The effectiveness of the City’s residential billing system was at best uncertain when the Torrance shop began its audit. While defining their scope, they developed relatively straightforward methodologies that incorporated data matching using computer software. Those methodologies allowed them to identify addresses that were not being billed for rubbish services. Their project methodology and audit findings were clearly linked and supported by good use of visuals in the presentation that accompanied their clear and concise report. Their project will result in increased revenues of about $25,000 per year in addition to collections on an additional $7,000 in retroactive billings.
Honorable Mention – Riverside (CA)
Project: Public Utilities – Water Division: Production, Operations and Maintenance Functions
The Riverside shop approached this audit by clearly defining the scope of their intended work and advising readers how other processes would be addressed in other projects. In their concise report, Riverside focused on the most important issue discovered during the audit – the need to improve water loss from their network. Their recommendations addressed the underlying reasons for real and apparent water loss from their system, thus facilitating increases in revenues and reductions in real losses. Of note is the fact that this was their first performance audit in ten years.
|