Main Menu
Home
Site Index


Search the website
Email the Webmaster


Peer Review Peer Review
Education and Training
Advocating for Auditing
Auditing Awards


Funkhouser on Auditing Funkhouser on Auditing
Opportunities for Improvement
Quarterly Articles
Guides and Reports
Past ALGA Quarterlies
Contribute an article


Abstract archives Abstract archives
New Abstracts
Latest GAO Reports


Member Websites Member Websites
Join Our ListServ


ALGA Board ALGA Board
ALGA Committees
ALGA Member Services
Constitution, Minutes
Organization Topics
Benefits of Joining


Member Geographies Member Geographies


The Wonderful World of ALGA Peer Review Participation, or - March 2000 Print E-mail

Written by David Jones,


The Wonderful World of ALGA Peer Review Participation, or: How I Survived Eating The Love Boat with Richard Wallace

When I first received an offer in the fall of 1997 to take part in a ALGA peer review, I have to admit that my primary motive in accepting the offer was the chance to take a trip to sunny San Jose, California. At that time it had been raining for weeks in Seattle. Since then, I’ve learned that there are many reasons in addition to weather that make participation on ALGA peer reviews worthwhile. To date I’ve participated in two ALGA peer reviews--San Jose and Multnomah County, Oregon in April 1999--and I look forward to doing more.

During a ALGA peer review, the review team goes through the following basic process: Read the policies and procedures manual of the office being reviewed and its responses to a ALGA pre-review questionnaire; Travel to the audit office; Meet the office’s staff and interview some of them to learn how the office does its work; and, Use a checklist based upon the Government Auditing Standards (aka Yellow Book) to review: A) the office’s quality assurance system, and B) the work papers created for selected products.

In the spirit of David Letterman, here’s my list of reasons for volunteering to work on a ALGA peer review team:

  1. The first reason for participating on a ALGA peer review is that you get to work with and meet interesting, even fun people. Now I know that ‘fun’ does not always leap to one’s mind when used with ‘auditor,’ but I have thoroughly enjoyed the people I have met during the reviews. During my first peer review, I worked with Richard Wallace from Jacksonville and Margaret Nielson from Austin. I learned a lot about auditing and other matters by working and socializing with them over the five days we were together. Richard has an extensive background in peer reviews--he participated in the first peer review sponsored by the National Association of State Auditors in 1983 and had been involved with three ALGA peer reviews before San Jose. Margaret, like myself, The Wonderful World of ALGA Peer Review Participation, or: How I Survived Eating The Love Boat with Richard Wallace was on her first peer review, but had extensive audit experience including stints with GAO and the Labor Department’s Office of Inspector General. On my second review, I was paired with Sharon Erickson from San Jose. Again I learned a great deal by working with Sharon because we came from offices that approached our work in somewhat different ways.
  2. Of course, it’s not only the members of the peer review team who are worth meeting. I also had the pleasure of meeting with the staff of the audit shops we reviewed. I learned a lot from San Jose’s Jerry Silva and Multnomah County’s Suzanne Flynn about the challenges of being, respectively, an appointed and elected head of an audit office.
  3. Another benefit of participation is the opportunity it provides one to learn about how other audit shops do things. As I like to say, it’s a great opportunity to ‘steal’ good ideas to use in your own shop. I was intrigued by San Jose’s use of risk matrices and Multnomah County’s electronic work papers.
  4. Working on a ALGA peer review team also helps you to understand what the Government Auditing Standards/Yellow Book really mean. It transforms them from dry abstractions to something more meaningful because during a review you have to determine whether an audit shop and its products comply with the standards. As someone who fell asleep during his introduction to the Yellow Book class at GAO, this is nothing short of amazing.
  5. Another advantage of participation on a ALGA peer review is the opportunity it provides for you to see exactly what goes on during such a review. I believe the best way to learn how to prepare for a peer review is by working on one. This experience can be quite helpful for anyone who is contemplating whether to undergo a peer review and can significantly decrease the anxiety level associated with them.
  6. Finally, your participation is a ‘quid pro quo.’ That is, if you want to have a ALGA review performed on your office, you must be willing to offer your services as a volunteer for a ALGA peer review of another office.
  7. This one isn’t a reason yet, but it could be. I and many other ALGA members are hopeful that the Government Auditing Standards Board will respond favorably to ALGA’s request that participation on a ALGA peer review team be recognized as worthy of credits for Continuing Professional Education (CPEs).
Let me conclude by saying that I highly recommend participation on a ALGA peer review. And if you’ve gotten this far in the article, you’re probably wondering what the title of this article was referring to when it mentioned eating the love boat with Richard Wallace. Of course, this is a blatantly obvious advertising trick to try to get you to read the entire article. Upon meeting Mr. Wallace, I soon discovered that he and I shared a similar passion. No, I’m not referring to macram? or collecting 19th century Ukrainian furniture, but eating large quantities of food. One night while in a Japanese restaurant in San Jose, we spotted a menu item called the ‘love boat’ that was described as suitable only for a pair of very hungry sumo wrestlers. The food was served on a bizarre replica of a boat. As auditors, we, of course, live to meet such challenges. I’m proud to say that Richard and I made short work of that boat despite our complete ignorance of sumo wrestling and the finite number of holes on our belts.

David Jones is Deputy City Auditor of Seattle, Washington



Users' Comments  
 

Average user rating

 

No comment posted

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.3 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
 
< Prev   Next >
Peer Review
Peer Review

Copyright © 1999-2006 Association of Local Government Auditors. All rights reserved.
ALGA, 449 Lewis Hargett Circle, Suite 290,
Lexington, KY 40503-3590
Telephone 859.276.0686 |
E-mail |